Skip to content
ProgVI

Building Production-Ready AI Agents

A practical checklist for moving an AI agent from a convincing demo to a system you can operate: scope, tools, evaluation, observability, and safe failure.

By ProgVI Engineering, Sample author2 min read

Sample article. This is illustrative placeholder content. It is not company research, a case study, or a report of customer experience.

Diagram of an agent loop with input and output, supported by tracing above and evaluations below.

Sample article. This is illustrative placeholder content. It is not company research or a report of customer experience.

A demo agent only has to work once. A production agent has to work on the thousandth input, on the day a model version changes, and when a downstream API is slow. This article outlines the engineering concerns that separate the two.

1. Start with a narrow job definition

Write the job as a testable statement: what inputs the agent receives, what it may do, and what a correct outcome looks like. Broad goals such as “help with support” are hard to evaluate. “Classify a ticket and draft a reply from approved articles” is not.

2. Treat tools as an API surface

Every tool an agent can call is part of its attack surface and its failure surface. Give each tool:

  • A strict input schema and validated outputs
  • The least privilege needed for its task
  • Timeouts, retries, and idempotency keys for anything that writes
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class RefundRequest(BaseModel):
    order_id: str = Field(pattern=r"^ORD-\d{6}$")
    amount_cents: int = Field(gt=0, le=50_000)
    reason: str = Field(max_length=500)

def issue_refund(req: RefundRequest, *, idempotency_key: str) -> dict:
    # Anything above the policy limit is routed to a person, not executed.
    ...

3. Decide where humans stay in the loop

Not every action deserves the same trust. A simple policy table makes the decision explicit and reviewable:

Action type Example Default handling
Read-only Look up an order Automatic
Reversible write Add an internal note Automatic, logged
Customer-visible Send a reply Review until quality is established
Irreversible or financial Issue a refund Human approval required

4. Evaluate before every release

Build a fixed set of realistic cases, including awkward ones, and run it whenever a prompt, model, or tool changes. Combine automated checks (schema validity, tool-call correctness) with periodic human review of sampled outputs.

Evaluation and tracing wrap the agent loop in the diagram above.

5. Make behaviour observable

Capture a trace of each run: model calls, tool calls, intermediate decisions, latency, and cost. When something goes wrong you need to answer why this answer without guessing.

6. Fail safely

Define what happens when the model is unavailable, a tool errors, or confidence is low. The safe default is usually to stop, record the state, and hand off to a person.

Where to go next

If you are comparing approaches, see AI Agents vs Traditional Automation. For workflows with several agents, read Designing Reliable Multi-Agent Systems. Our services page describes how we support this work.

A supervisor agent dispatching work to retriever, analyst, and reviewer agents that share a common state.
AI Engineering2 min read

Designing Reliable Multi-Agent Systems

Design principles for systems with several cooperating agents: explicit roles, typed shared state, bounded loops, and traceable hand-offs.

Sample article

Two diagrams: a linear rule-based flow from trigger to condition to action, and an agentic flow with a goal, a plan, and tools in a feedback loop.
Agentic Workflows2 min read

AI Agents vs Traditional Automation

When rules and scripts are the right tool, when an agent earns its added complexity, and why most real systems combine both.

Sample article

Let’s Build Your Next AI Solution.

Tell us about the process you want to improve. We will respond with practical next steps.

Start a Conversation